Daniil Medvedev Threatens To Retire From Atp Finals In On Court Meltdown

The latest and trending news from around the world.

Daniil Medvedev threatens to retire from ATP Finals in full-blown meltdown after penalty
Daniil Medvedev threatens to retire from ATP Finals in full-blown meltdown after penalty from

Daniil Medvedev Threatens to Retire from ATP Finals in On-Court Meltdown

Medvedev's Frustration Boils Over After Penalty

Daniil Medvedev's frustration boiled over at the ATP Finals on Thursday, as the Russian star threatened to retire from the tournament after receiving a penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct.

The incident occurred during Medvedev's match against Stefanos Tsitsipas. Medvedev had just dropped his serve in the first set when he smashed his racket to the ground in frustration.

The umpire immediately issued Medvedev a code violation and awarded Tsitsipas a point. Medvedev was furious, arguing with the umpire and threatening to retire from the match.

Medvedev's Behavior Costs Him

Medvedev's outburst did not help his cause. He went on to lose the first set and eventually the match in straight sets.

The penalty was particularly costly for Medvedev, who was already in danger of not qualifying for the semifinals. The loss to Tsitsipas means that Medvedev must now win his remaining two matches in the round-robin stage to have any chance of advancing.

Medvedev's Behavior Draws Criticism

Medvedev's behavior has drawn criticism from some quarters. Former world number one Boris Becker said that Medvedev's actions were "unprofessional" and that he should be fined.

Other commentators have suggested that Medvedev's behavior is simply a reflection of the pressure he is under to perform at the ATP Finals. Medvedev is one of the top players in the world and is expected to perform well at every tournament he plays in.

Medvedev Apologizes for Behavior

Medvedev has since apologized for his behavior. He said that he was "frustrated" and that he should not have reacted the way he did.

Medvedev's apology is unlikely to appease his critics, but it is a sign that he is aware of the need to control his emotions on court.